Defence lawyers in the trial of Natalie Strecker, accused of supporting banned groups, argued that prosecutors selectively focused on eight posts from her 51,000 social media messages. Strecker, who denies the charges, maintains her posts were personal commentary on the Middle East and not an invitation to support proscribed organisations. The defence highlighted that using terms like 'resistance' does not equate to promoting these groups, and pointed to Strecker's explicit statement rejecting support for Hamas and condemning attacks on civilians. The court's lay jurors have now retired to consider their verdict.