Defence lawyers in the trial of Natalie Strecker have accused prosecutors of selectively using evidence by focusing on eight social media posts out of over fifty thousand. Strecker, who faces charges of inviting support for banned groups, maintains her posts were personal commentary on the ongoing Middle East situation and asserts her right to share opinions online. The prosecution argues that her posts indicate she supported the groups out of anger or desperation, referring to them as 'the resistance' and accusing Israel of genocide. The trial continues as both sides debate the intent and context of Strecker's online activity.