Western media outlets are facing criticism for their limited and often biased coverage of ongoing protests in Iran against the country's authoritarian regime. Analysts and activists argue that international reporters frequently downplay the anti-regime nature of demonstrations, instead reframing them as general cost-of-living protests and amplifying the regime's own talking points. This pattern is attributed to the structure of foreign reporting, which prioritizes access to officials and safety over challenging official narratives, resulting in coverage that launders Tehran's propaganda and sidelines the voices of dissidents.

The article highlights how some Western journalists justify their lack of coverage by citing difficulties in verifying social media footage or gaining entry to Iran, while critics point out inconsistencies in their reporting standards compared to other conflict zones. Iranian activists have voiced their frustration on social media, accusing Western media of amplifying regime narratives and neglecting those risking their lives for freedom. The piece concludes that the courage of Iranian protesters stands in stark contrast to the perceived moral inertia of much of the Western press, and calls for greater attention to the struggle for democracy in Iran.