The article criticizes a recent opinion piece by David Ignatius in The Washington Post for presenting a biased and incomplete account of the Gaza War. It argues that Ignatius omits crucial context, such as the October 7 attacks by Hamas that triggered the conflict, and uses emotionally charged language that unfairly blames Israel while minimizing or ignoring Hamas's actions and intentions. The article highlights specific examples of what it sees as misleading framing, including the portrayal of civilian casualties and the false equivalence between Israel and Hamas. It concludes that such reporting distorts the reality of the conflict and perpetuates longstanding editorial bias against Israel at the newspaper.