The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached a critical point, with widespread starvation and famine conditions drawing increased international condemnation and shifting political attitudes, particularly in the United States and Europe. The discussion among New York Times Opinion writers highlights how the severity of hunger and suffering in Gaza has led to a reevaluation of support for Israel, even among its traditional allies, and has prompted more open criticism from politicians who were previously silent.

The panelists explore the complexities behind the ongoing conflict, including Israel's military strategy, the role of Hamas, and the broader geopolitical implications for the Middle East and Western alliances. They note that Israel's approach has created a situation where humanitarian concerns are now at the forefront, and international pressure is mounting for a change in policy.

Domestically, the crisis is causing significant political realignment in the United States, with growing divisions within both major parties over support for Israel. The conversation also touches on the psychological toll of the conflict on Israeli society and the uncertain future for both Gaza and the region as a whole.

Ultimately, the panelists express concern about the long-term consequences of the current strategies, warning that continued suffering in Gaza could lead to further instability, erode international support for Israel, and complicate efforts to achieve a lasting resolution.