Andrew Fox, a former British Army officer and defense researcher, argues that Israel is justified in targeting Al Jazeera in Gaza, not only because some of its journalists are alleged members of armed groups, but also due to the network's active role in the information war. Fox contends that modern conflict extends beyond traditional combatants, encompassing those who shape battlefield narratives and influence military operations through media. He asserts that Al Jazeera's coverage has directly impacted Israeli military actions, constrained operational freedom, and prolonged the conflict by amplifying certain narratives and mobilizing international pressure.

According to Fox, when a media outlet ceases to be an independent observer and instead acts as an operational asset for a belligerent party, it loses its civilian protection under the Law of Armed Conflict. He claims Al Jazeera fulfills the criteria for direct participation in hostilities, making its personnel and infrastructure legitimate military targets. Fox concludes that the battle in Gaza is fought not just with weapons, but also through information, and that accountability for media involvement in conflict is essential.