Calls to prosecute the use of starvation as a weapon of war are growing louder, as recent conflicts have seen a resurgence of this ancient tactic. Human rights advocates and experts highlight cases in places like Sudan and Gaza, where blockades and sieges have left thousands of civilians without food, arguing that these acts constitute war crimes under international law. Despite clear legal frameworks, including the Geneva Conventions and recent amendments to the Rome Statute, no one has yet faced trial solely for the war crime of starvation.

Legal experts point to challenges in proving intent and establishing jurisdiction, but note that international awareness and accountability mechanisms are increasing. Landmark steps, such as United Nations resolutions and International Criminal Court warrants specifically citing starvation, signal a shift toward recognizing and prosecuting this crime. Advocates remain hopeful that, with growing attention and political will, those responsible for deliberately starving civilians may eventually be brought to justice.