Testimony in the Jerusalem District Court this week has cast new doubt on the most serious corruption case against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. A senior police investigator, Ron Solomon, claimed that exculpatory evidence was suppressed and investigative findings were altered to support the prosecution's narrative, despite evidence contradicting key allegations, such as an alleged meeting central to the case. Solomon also testified that he was ordered to delete findings that undermined the prosecution's claims about favorable media coverage, raising concerns about investigative misconduct and selective evidence handling. These revelations have intensified calls for a presidential pardon and renewed scrutiny of the legitimacy of the proceedings, with the case now seen as a test not only of Netanyahu but of Israel's legal system itself.