The article examines the complex and often contradictory messaging from American and Israeli officials regarding possible intervention in Iran. While some statements suggest a willingness to support regime change, others indicate a focus on deterring Iranian aggression rather than direct involvement. This ambiguity reflects a strategic approach where both nations prepare for multiple scenarios, including supporting protests, deterring attacks, or even intervening if provoked, without committing to a single course of action. The analysis also considers how these shifting policies may be influenced by recent events, such as the fall of the Syrian regime and ongoing tensions with Hezbollah, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and readiness in a volatile region.