The Lancet, a leading medical journal, has recently published an exchange on the war in Gaza that highlights a shift in its editorial approach. Rather than focusing solely on scientific inquiry, the journal appears to be embracing a role as a platform for moral and political messaging. This development raises important questions about the purpose and responsibilities of scientific publications, especially when they engage with contentious global issues. The debate is less about the specific conclusions reached and more about the implications of using medical journals for advocacy rather than objective analysis.